The Oracle
of Bacon

Who is the Center of the Hollywood Universe?

Hopefully, you've played around a bit with The Oracle of Bacon at Virginia and discovered how few steps are necessary to link just about anybody who has ever been in a movie to Kevin Bacon, but could there be some actor or actress who is even closer to the center of the Hollywood universe? The answer turns out to be: yes.

By processing all of the nearly 800,000 people in the Internet Movie Database I discovered that there are currently 1048 people who are better centers than Kevin Bacon! What does it mean for one person to be a "better" center than another? Consider the following breakdown of people by Bacon Number (as of June 29, 2004):

Bacon Number# of people
0 1
1 1806
2 145024
3 395126
4 95497
5 7451
6 933
7 106
8 13

That means that there is 1 person who can be linked in 0 steps (Bacon himself), 1806 people who can be linked in 1 step, 145024 people who can be linked in 2 steps, etc. So we can compute the average Bacon Number as follows:

((0*1)+(1*1806)+(2*145024)+(3*395126)+(4*95497)+(5*7451)+(6*933)+(7*106)+(8*13)) / (1+1806+145024+395126+95497+7451+933+106+13)

= 1902919 / 645957

= 2.946

So the average Bacon Number is about 2.946. We can compare that with the average Connery Number for actor Sean Connery. The breakdown is as follows (as of June 29, 2004):

Connery Number# of people
0 1
1 2272
2 218560
3 380721
4 40263
5 3537
6 535
7 66
8 2

By computing the average of these numbers we see that the average Connery Number is about 2.731 making Connery a better center than Bacon. This is not to denigrate Mr. Bacon, and it should be noted that being the 1049th best center out of nearly 800,000 people makes Bacon a better center than 99% of the people who have ever appeared in a feature film. A list of the 1000 best centers in the Hollywood universe is available for your enjoyment.

Is there a "worst" center (or most obscure actor) in the Hollywood universe? Of course. I won't tell you the name of the person who produces the highest average number in the IMDb, but his/her table looks like this (as of June 29, 2004):

XXXXXX Number# of people
0 1
1 1
2 7
3 2
4 21
5 28
6 15
7 115
8 44700
9 440047
10 148900
11 10764
12 1158
13 183
14 14
15 1

for an average of 9.200!